What Is the Insanity Defense Used in Kentucky Law?
The insanity defense, a legal strategy used to argue that a defendant should not be held criminally responsible for their actions due to a mental illness, has been the subject of considerable public and legal scrutiny. Despite its portrayal in popular media and high-profile cases, its effectiveness remains a topic of debate. In reality, using the insanity defense is a complex and challenging endeavor. Interestingly, four states have opted not to allow the insanity defense. Although Kentucky allows its use, there are stringent criteria and scrutiny associated with it.
In the following article, we will provide more detailed information about the insanity defense and its potential impact on a case.
What Is the Insanity Defense?
The insanity defense is a type of defense where the attorney admits that their client committed the criminal act but seeks to excuse their behavior by reason of insanity. Essentially, the attorney is arguing that at the time of the crime, their client’s mental state was such that they should not be held legally responsible for their actions.
When an attorney raises this defense, it can lead to a request for a psychological evaluation to determine the defendant’s criminal liability. This evaluation can be requested by the defense attorney, the prosecution, or the court. The criteria for assessing whether a criminal defendant is legally insane may vary depending on the jurisdiction, as different regions may apply different standards or tests to determine legal insanity.
Assessing Legal Insanity in Kentucky
In Kentucky, the assessment of legal insanity for individuals accused of committing a crime is primarily based on the Model Penal Code Test (MPC test). According to the MPC test, a defendant may be found not legally accountable for their actions if, at the time of the offense, they were affected by a relevant mental defect or illness and were unable to comprehend the criminal nature of their behavior or to conform their conduct to the requirements of the law.
The MPC test incorporates elements from other insanity standards that evaluate legal insanity, including the M’Naghten Rule and the Irresistible Impulse Test. For instance, the M’Naghten rule dictates that a defendant is not guilty by reason of insanity if they are incapable of discerning between right and wrong due to a mental defect or illness. The Irresistible Impulse Test stipulates that a defendant is not legally responsible for their actions if they were under the influence of a mental defect or illness that compelled them to act in a manner contrary to their moral and legal obligations. However, it is crucial to note that the MPC test encompasses a broader scope compared to these alternative criteria for assessing legal insanity.
Do You Need a Criminal Defense Attorney To Pursue an Insanity Defense?
The impact of having a criminal conviction on your record cannot be overstated. Beyond the immediate legal consequences, it can have far-reaching effects on both you and your family. A felony conviction may not only result in the loss of your job and freedom, but it can also lead to the loss of a professional license, difficulties in securing employment, challenges in finding housing, and ineligibility for educational loans. In such difficult times, reaching out to a skilled Northern Kentucky criminal defense attorney with extensive experience in the local court system is crucial.
At Hoffman, Walker & Knauf, our legal team is committed to providing a solid defense tailored to your specific circumstances. As your advocates, we will ensure you receive the personalized attention and support you need. We will tirelessly fight for your rights and work to secure the best possible outcome for you and your loved ones.
Contact Hoffman Walker & Knauf Today To Discuss Your Case
To learn more about the insanity defense or to discuss your case in more detail, contact Hoffman Walker & Knauf today.
